Meet the Bilderbergs

War, famine, poverty and disease are the banes of humanity. It is not difficult to see

why mankind has been unable to address these problems or to accept that greed

is the greatest hurdle to the satisfactory resolution of these issues. As the financial

markets of the world continue to unravel, many are beginning to question the

policies and strategies of governments, institutions and corporations that seem to

be sending us hurtling towards a complete social and financial breakdown.

 

By Tom Wilson

 

Have our duly elected governments

simply dropped the ball?

Or is the current state of the world

‘intended’ to leave us at the mercy

of the financial elite whose plan

for global domination disregards

the suffering of mankind in favour

of a more highly prized ideal,

that of profit?

Blatant abuse of power to obtain

profit, and of course more

power, seems to be a common

theme throughout governmental

and corporate policy and as the

lines blur between those in political

positions and those pulling the

corporate strings, what emerges

is a picture of a global elite whose

agenda is to benefit the few at the

expense of the many. This relentless

drive for total control of the

world’s resources, including its

populous, resembles for some the

four horsemen of the apocalypse

dancing unencumbered across

the surface of the earth.

Who are these faceless elite

and how, in a world seemingly

so complex, do they manage

to orchestrate such an elaborate

and self-serving agenda? Could

it be possible that a rich minority

have the reins on media, politics

and finance to such an extent as

to be able to coerce world events

and direction? Are these few with

their desire for absolute profit

the motivating force behind the

West’s global agenda and its disregard

for collateral damage? At

this point any conspiracy theorist

worth his salt would begin to recite

names such the Trilateral Coalition,

The Council for Foreign

Relations, even the Round Table,

as the foundation institutions

they insist are the hidden policy

makers behind our governments.

 

From whence it came

 

The Bilderberg group is a yearly

meeting of some of the West’s

most influential figures from the

worlds of finance, politics and

media. Although it gains its name

from the Bilderberg Hotel in the

Netherlands, the site of its origin

in 1954, this supposedly informal

meeting is held at various five star

hotels throughout Europe and

the US and always under a net of

seemingly impenetrable security.

The attendees are there by invitation

only and the discussions

that take place do so under a veil

of secrecy that has seen its participants

banned from even alluding

to its contents. Considering

the guest list which includes

royalty, media moguls and representatives

of the West’s richest

and most powerful individuals,

media attention of the event

is surprisingly lacking with the

world’s mainstream media seemingly

unaware, uninterested or

restricted from taking an interest

in this meeting of such grand figures.

The Bilderberg group values

its privacy above all and cites

the need of its members to speak

freely on topics of concern to be

of the utmost importance during

this three-day think tank.

 

Whys and wherefores

 

The group, at its most benign, insists

it is merely a forum for ideas,

no declarations are made, no

policies announced and no official

plans are laid out as part of

the conference, yet the very level

of secrecy surrounding the Bilderberg

group begs the question -

if there is nothing to hide, why all

the secrecy? Many of the figures

who attend these conferences are

in public office and many wonder

if it is public money that funds

their visit to this luxurious threeday

think tank. It is certainly

public funds that supply the security

as the secret services, army

and police forces of the government

hosting the event are called

upon to ensure its seclusion. It is

a little unsettling that these elite

choose to keep their thoughts and

opinions a secret from all and,

this should, if nothing else, raise

questions as to the group’s agenda.

The very fact that a percentage

of the invitees are from the major

western media concerns, and

that little or no reporting of these

events reaches the public, should

be cause to raise red flags for all

those who are even a little skeptical

of the 130 or so ‘Dark Suits’,

representing the world’s most

powerful and influential figures,

coming together for alleged private,

informal discussions.

Not surprisingly the conspiracy

theorists are highly vocal on

the subject.

YouTube is awash with video

snippets, not only of the opinions

of conspiracy theorists like David

Icke and Alex Jones, but also

with nervous retorts by grinning

politicians as they are questioned

about the roles of these various

groups. Bland political spin and

condescending rhetoric seems to

replace truth and the secret nature

of these meetings is vigorously

maintained.

 

What you know or…

 

In 1954 Joseph Ratinger along

with Prince Bernhard of the

Netherlands contacted Walter

Bedell, then head of the CIA,

with a proposal to form an informal

meeting of members of the

Atlantic Community with a view

to discussing the problems faced

by that same community.

At the time there was considerable

anti-US sentiment in Europe

and the aim of this initial meeting

was to present a forum for discussion

that would enable both sides

of the Atlantic to pursue common

ideals and goals.

Attending the first meeting

were figures like David Rockefeller

and Henry Kissinger along

with many other highly powerful

figures of the time. The success

of this meeting prompted it

to become a yearly event where

a permanent Steering Committee

set the agenda for discussion and

decided on the guest list. Since

that time the Bilderberg group has

been having its almost clandestine

meetings and boasts an impressive

array of guests including Bill Clinton,

Tony Blair, Donald Rumsfeld

and Paul Wolfowitz.

The group has been accused

of inviting and influencing politicians

who are willing to follow

an agenda that suits the corporate

elite and indeed Bill Clinton,

Tony Blair and current President

of the European Commission,

José Manuel (Durão) Barroso, all

attended the meeting before they

took office.

The accusation that members of

the Bilderberg group influence the

outcome of political appointments

and policies stems from the fact

that the attendees, some of whom

fund campaigns for the likes of

Obama and McCain, are working

towards the same policies dictated

by the Bilderberg group.

Barack Obama has denied he

has attended Bilderberg, yet this

year the meeting, held at Chantilly

in Virginia, near Washington,

just happened to be 26 miles from

where the now president-elect happened

to be residing at the time

and, as luck would have it, the entire

press entourage that accompanied

him on his presidential

campaign were sent on a plane to

Chicago allowing him, it was said,

to attend a private meeting with

Hillary Clinton. The press has spoken

of a feeling of being kidnapped

in order for them to be unable to report

on Obama’s movements and it

would seem a little too coincidental

that he disappeared at the exact

time that the Bilderberg group was

meeting so close by. Of course, coincidences

do happen.

Also attending this year’s conference

were the Porto and Lisbon

mayors, Rui Rio and Antonio Costa

respectively, both of whom are

possibly being considered as future

leadership candidates.

 

Policymaker?

 

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time

Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended

our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40

years… It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the

world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those

years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march

towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an

intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national

auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”

David Rockefeller, Bilderberg Meeting, June 1991, Baden-Baden, Germany

 

 

It seems that the cat is somewhat

out of the bag this year and,

for the first time, the Bilderberg

group released a short press release

announcing the meeting

and it is apparent as you surf the

net that members both past and

present are slightly more open to

discuss the meeting’s existence if

not content, although most insist

it is still a benign event.

An interesting quote by Dennis

Healy, when asked about the influence

of the group and the conspiracy

theories surrounding its

agenda, was that it is “exaggerated,

but not unfair”. When we

look at the sheer logistics of getting

so many powerful people in

one place and under relative secrecy,

it does begin to raise questions

as to the benefits derived

from participation.

It may be that this group meets

in a spirit of harmless cooperation

and that no firm ideas are put

in place as a result of these meetings

but that seems unlikely.

The Bilderberg group insists its

meetings are well-meaning, yet

the very level of influence exerted

by its members in their relative

fields could lead us to assume

that topics and concerns raised at

the meeting then go on to form

the basis of current world policies.

The group is said to be the

driving force behind the policies

of the Neo-Cons whose founding

members, Rumsfeld, Cheney

and Wolfowitz, are unrepentant

in the aim to extend the powers

of the US and its corporate elite

worldwide.

The Bilderberg group and others

like them do themselves no

favours by hiding the true intent

of these meetings and if, as they

say, they are harmless why all the

secrecy?

Perhaps the Bilderberg group

does represent the secret government

of the new world order and,

if so, what indeed is their agenda

and, is it not time for the people to

be privy to the thoughts and ideas

of this elite? When we look at the

policies of the Neo-Cons and the

actions of the WTO, IMF and the

Federal Reserve we begin to see

a picture emerge of a worldwide

strategy to obtain and maintain

profit. Many of the world’s most

powerful figures and the leaders

of these institutions attend the

Bilderberg meetings and it is rumoured

that these figures dictate

the direction of world events.

 

Getting on top

 

The plus side of a pyramidal system

is that a top tier with enough

influence to truly affect the outcome

of world policy does exist.

Perhaps it is not that we need to

replace or unseat this elite but

rather to demand a level of input

and transparency as to ensure

that the good of the many outweighs

the greed of the few.

It seems that somehow we

must regain control and reign

in the selfish desires of those

corporate and political entities

that currently ride rough-shod

over us all. We have the money

and technology to ensure the

human rights and dignity of all

who dwell on earth without endangering

precious profit, but it

is the sole adherence to the bottom

line that seems to take precedence

over all other considerations

and this could be seen as

the true motivating force behind

the Bilderberg meetings.

In a world where the majority

of people are better educated

and more aware, this is an issue

that must surely be addressed. It

would take extraordinary minds

to manipulate the world toward

profitable chaos. Perhaps we

should demand that same intellect

turn its attention to alleviate

rather than exacerbate the human

condition?

The people we place in positions

of power have an obligation

to work for our benefit yet

it seems that the secrecy behind

these meetings would suggest

that it is possible these elite in

Dark Suits are pursuing another

agenda.

Soon we shall take a look at the

influence behind the members of

Bilderberg and also the actions

of entities like the Neo-Cons, the

Federal Reserve (did you know

the Federal Reserve is a private

company!), and events like 9/11

which are seen by some as the

catalyst for a new world order.

 

All the President’s men (well some of them, and women)

 

Since his election, Barack Obama has nominated some of his

cabinet staff, the people who will fulfill his promise of change.

Here are some of his choices so far:

Hilary Clinton (Bilderberg 1997)

Timothy Geither (Bilderberg 2008, Trilateral Commission (TRI)

and Council for Foreign Relations (CFR))

James Jones (Bilderberg 1985)

Tom Dashel (Bilderberg 2008)

James A Johnson (member of Obama’s VP selection team -

Bilderberg 2008), TRI and CFR

Robert Gates (Bilderberg)

Joe Biden (CFR)

Paul Volker (TRI and CFR)

Lawrence Summers (Bilderberg 1998, 2002, 2008, TRI and CFR)

 

It will be interesting, and possibly disturbing, to see Obama’s full

cabinet when he finally takes office in 2009.

It is probably just another unlucky coincidence but as a wise man

once said “if it looks like a sheep and baas, its probably a sheep”.

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.